Skip to content
Thursday, October 8, 2026
Coremark

Tetris Wouldn't Win at This Gaming Ceremony — An Additional Classification Could Fix That

Whenever a major honors show draws close, there’s always a clamor for the addition additional classifications to acknowledge overlooked contributions and fill the hearts of enthusiasts dedicated to specific genres.

Another commentator made the case advocating for terror-themed awards. It would be amazing. Equally deserving are tabletop games, which is a dedicated supporter's campaign. However, I must insist if I try to elbow in front just as with other dedicated enthusiasts, I possess a compelling case backing this proposal is the most urgent and significant. Here's the proposal: We need a category for puzzle games.

Organizing Gaming Categories

Organizing artistic expressions defies precise measurement; it remains highly personal, and it will always start arguments concluding with vague boundaries. This explains why film award organizations avoid this approach. However, it represents a necessary evil in the world of interactive entertainment, showing incredible range they barely qualify one unified medium.

For the full spectrum of achievement in video games to be recognized, and to ensure all game types to compete fairly, specific award classifications remain vital.

Existing Game Classification System

Prominent interactive entertainment events offer these genre categories for Action, Action/Adventure, RPG experiences, Combat games, Sim/Strategy, plus athletic and racing experiences. Together, these classifications effectively encompass many game types, allowing placement for most games within them.

Different situation exists for logic-based experiences. No appropriate category exists to put them. Think about these this year’s best games, each quite distinct: structural challenges from a specific release, the pulse-pounding block-matching of another game, and the sweetly sociological logic puzzles of a third title. Which classification works within current classifications? Simply put, no category fits.

Acknowledgment Issues

There are dozens of brilliant puzzle games launched regularly without proper recognition during gaming ceremonies, except when they manage to fit classification types such as Mobile Game, Virtual reality experiences, and the highly challenging small studio competitions.

  • An iconic brain-teaser got overlooked in any category that year
  • A different innovative game missed out during that ceremony
  • A beloved organization game was overlooked in 2021
  • Limited numbers of logic titles barely qualified for niche award types

Importance of Logic Titles

Commonly they're compact experiences, yet the craft in brain-teasers carries substantial weight. Famous handheld logic titles stand as most popular titles globally and have been for an extended period.

The legendary block-stacking game competes with well-known building titles for the title of most purchased experience; it also contends for best game of all time. Brain-teasers form essential building blocks to the art of video games, and they are in conversation with almost every other genre.

Proposal and Rationale

Logic titles wouldn't face such difficulty. You could fill a field of five engaging, different, qualified experiences annually without trouble — or rather, with difficulty, because you’d have to leave so many good games out.

To emphasize again, these are games that otherwise have no home during prominent ceremonies. Puzzle game makers operate at the hard edge game development, creating some of the purest expressions of gaming itself. Comparable to movie stunt professionals, they deserve recognition. Let’s not keep them waiting generations.

About the author

Shannon Knight

A tech journalist and innovation strategist with over a decade of experience covering emerging technologies and their impact on business and society.

Coremark

Type to search articles.